Welcome

About the Society

FOCUS - the Society's Journal

Join the Society

News

What's On

Bookshop

Disclaimer

Links

 
powered by FreeFind

 

   
 

Focus Summer 2001 - Menu - Index - Previous - Next

 

 

TRANSPORT GROUP NEWS PARK & RIDE

When the public were consulted about the construction of Tram link, a few people did suggest that there should some "Park and Ride" car parks provided at Tramlink stops. The proposals were resisted by the planners. With the opening of Tramlink, informal "Park and Ride" started. Motorists started parking in residential streets in the vicinity of Tramlink stations. Initially numbers were small but are now sufficiently large that the volume of parking is considered to be a nuisance in some roads with the result that the council have been forced to consider formal "Park and Ride" car parks. It is argued that "Park and Ride" is successful in many provincial towns and cities. Examples are Bath, Cambridge, Canterbury, Ipswich, Maidstone, Norwich, Oxford and York. In these towns, the "Park and Ride" car parks are generally outside the continuously built-up area and are served by dedicated "Park and Ride" buses which operate non-stop from the car parks to the town centre. The price charged for "Park and Ride" is generally lower than the fares charged on local bus services in these towns for a journey of similar length. This practice undermines local bus services thereby encouraging greater use of the car. It should be unacceptable in an egalitarian society because it treats bus using town dwellers as second class citizens.

Tramlink is more expensive than local buses in Croydon. It would not be practicable to charge "Park and Ride" passengers less than ordinary passengers although it would be possible to make the parking element of "Park and Ride" free. This latter option should never be considered by a local authority whose Unitary Development Plan requires people to minimise car usage. Moreover, the cost of providing car parking to satisfy potential demand is massive - Tramlink's present capacity on the New Addington route alone is over 2,000 passengers per hour which could mean a potential demand for over 5,000 parking spaces. Providing a 250 space car park, which would only satisfy 5% of the potential demand could cost over £lmillion to build and would require too much land to be acceptable at any of the Tramlink stops.

Hence, the only practical way to avoid excessive parking in roads near Tramlink stops is to introduce parking restrictions in those roads as long as parking controls and traffic congestion are considered to be the only acceptable methods of restraining car use.

THE MAYOR OF LONDON'S PLANNING STRATEGY

The Mayor of London initial consultation on a planning strategy advocates increasing the population of Greater London rather than continuing the policy of dispersal of population into the Home Counties. It is suggested that development densities should be increased where public transport accessibility is good. It assumes that traffic congestion can be reduced by encouraging use of alternatives to the private car. However, we consider that this strategy is fundamentally flawed. It will aggravate traffic congestion because it will continue to be cheaper for the motorist to travel in the car he would otherwise leave in the garage than to use public transport.

Chloride